Classic Rotary Phones Forum

Telephone Talk => Auction Talk => Topic started by: AL_as_needed on April 13, 2016, 08:33:31 PM

Title: 54 500
Post by: AL_as_needed on April 13, 2016, 08:33:31 PM
Older 500 up for auction at goodwill, paired with a 2500. I'm passing over this one, figured I'd let ya'll in on it. Play fair.
Title: Re: 54 500
Post by: TelePlay on April 13, 2016, 09:39:22 PM
Quote from: AL_as_needed on April 13, 2016, 08:33:31 PM
Older 500 up for auction at goodwill, paired with a 2500.

This one?

http://www.shopgoodwill.com/auctions/3PC-Beige--Black-Vintage-Rotary-Telephones-29021459.html

Title: Re: 54 500
Post by: AL_as_needed on April 13, 2016, 10:21:00 PM
Yes, that would be them. Not sure what the third piece is though, title says 3pc, I only count two phones...
Title: Re: 54 500
Post by: AL_as_needed on April 17, 2016, 12:57:40 PM
Well this is sad to admit, but I ended up with these two. Looks like the little devil on my shoulder won out in the debate.....time to look for a 426a tube in the box O stuff.
Title: Re: 54 500
Post by: Greg G. on April 17, 2016, 09:16:25 PM
The bottom says it's a 501, how is that different?
Title: Re: 54 500
Post by: AL_as_needed on April 17, 2016, 10:02:25 PM
It's a party line set version of the 500.
The 501 is more or less identical to a 500, with the addition of an electronic tube (vacuum tube) in the ring circut, I presume to act as a means to vary the ring voltage to allow more sets on a given phone line. Could be mistaken though, I'm not well versed in the 501 .....yet. BSPs I have skimmed weren't too clear on their specifics.


But hey, two for ten, ill bite haha.
Title: Re: 54 500
Post by: unbeldi on April 17, 2016, 11:19:28 PM
Ringing bridges with electron tubes are used for four-party fully selective service, that means each of the four parties on the line can be rung individually without code ringing.  However, with code ringing these sets could also be used on eight-party lines, which was called semi-selective service.

A normal party line without code ringing can only accommodate two parties, one ringer connected to the ring side and one connected to the tip side, with the return being earth ground.

Four-party service was accomplished with polarized superimposed ring current, so on tip and ring each was a positively and negatively polarized set.  The electron tube is a cold-cathode tube that acts exactly like a diode, conducting only in one direction.  By reversing the diode between the two set on one line side, the two ringers could be rung individually when the ringing polarity was inverted.

Using tubes also has the advantage of providing a balanced line even when there were not the same number of ringers on each line side, because the impedance of a tube is essentially infinite when not triggered, in contrast to a ringing bridge with a capacitor, the normal setup.

The 501B telephone was the second type produced in the 500-line starting in 1950.

Title: Re: 54 500
Post by: andre_janew on April 18, 2016, 01:19:51 PM
When I first got my landline, a computer chip was used and the chip was inside the box mounted on the side of the house.  There was also a switch inside the box.  The 1 position was for private line and the 2 position was for party line.  I know this because the chip failed on me and I had to use a neighbor's phone to report the trouble as I could receive calls, but couldn't dial out.  They went from tubes to chips.
Title: Re: 54 500
Post by: AL_as_needed on April 18, 2016, 02:25:40 PM
What year did they start to make the switch from tubes to chips?

I know most 501 sets were more or less converted back to 500s and the tubes removed when party line service was phased out.
Title: Re: 54 500
Post by: WEBellSystemChristian on April 18, 2016, 05:01:18 PM
Quote from: AL_as_needed on April 18, 2016, 02:25:40 PM
What year did they start to make the switch from tubes to chips?

I know most 501 sets were more or less converted back to 500s and the tubes removed when party line service was phased out.
The tube was only used for sets on a party line. Party lines within the Bell System were phased out by the late fifties, and thus, the 501 was discontinued.
Title: Re: 54 500
Post by: Weco355aman on April 18, 2016, 05:21:27 PM
Party lines were still in use until the mid 1980's on the west coast. I was on a 4 party line as well as about 1/3 of the rural areas in Oregon, Montana, Washington
and Nevada that I knew about. Weco made a Electronic unit that supported all of the Party line phones located on the customer premises. It was a 28A ringer isolator mounted at the Protector, then wired to the ringer on the yellow lead. The ringer isolator wired according to the party for that customer. T+ R+ T- R-. The ringer inside of the phone was connected to the Tip or Ring and switched ground. It was not recommended to mix tub's and ringer isolators on same line. The ringer isolator had a opto isolator inside it. It would switch the ground ON for that party during ringing.     
Title: Re: 54 500
Post by: andre_janew on April 18, 2016, 06:35:03 PM
I think they had party lines in use in the midwest until the mid 1980s as well.  The Enhanced 911 system came in and party lines went out.
Title: Re: 54 500
Post by: poplar1 on April 18, 2016, 06:57:44 PM
Ben, who told you they were all gone by the 1950s?

I  had a 2-party line from a 2BESS C.O. in Lithonia, GA installed in Sept, 1988. (Southern Bell)

I had a 2 Party Line from a #5 Crossbar C.O. in E. Gadsden, AL installed in July, 1986. (South Central Bell). This one had a device installed in the ONI (outside network interface) to permit use of standard phones. (I don't recall having to rewire the sets. Kept the device when I moved, but have no idea where it is now. I think it may have disconnected the phone if the other party's phone was ringing.)

I was the Tip party on a 2FR line on a DMS-100 (418 647) à Québec from 1982-1983. (Bell Canada). This required wiring the sets for Tip Party ID; otherwise, the other party would have gotten  the bill for any toll calls I made.

And my first 4FR -- semi-selective, so no tubes, just a R-500DR-3 set -- installed on a Step-by-Step line in 1968. (Southern Bell)
Title: Re: 54 500
Post by: WEBellSystemChristian on April 19, 2016, 08:53:23 AM
Quote from: poplar1 on April 18, 2016, 06:57:44 PM
Ben, who told you they were all gone by the 1950s?

I  had a 2-party line from a 2BESS C.O. in Lithonia, GA installed in Sept, 1988. (Southern Bell)

I had a 2 Party Line from a #5 Crossbar C.O. in E. Gadsden, AL installed in July, 1986. (South Central Bell). This one had a device installed in the ONI (outside network interface) to permit use of standard phones. (I don't recall having to rewire the sets. Kept the device when I moved, but have no idea where it is now. I think it may have disconnected the phone if the other party's phone was ringing.)

I was the Tip party on a 2FR line on a DMS-100 (418 647) à Québec from 1982-1983. (Bell Canada). This required wiring the sets for Tip Party ID; otherwise, the other party would have gotten  the bill for any toll calls I made.

And my first 4FR -- semi-selective, so no tubes, just a R-500DR-3 set -- installed on a Step-by-Step line in 1968. (Southern Bell)

I (Christian ;) ) have never seen a 501 later than 1956 1957, and I thought I had read somewhere that they were discontinued by 1959. I never knew party lines existed past the '50s, but I guess there was no reason for them not to!
Title: Re: 54 500
Post by: andre_janew on April 19, 2016, 12:35:38 PM
The 501 model may have been discontinued by 1959, but the party lines weren't.  There may have been a party line version of the 500 after 1959, but it probably had a different model number, something other than 501.
Title: Re: 54 500
Post by: unbeldi on April 19, 2016, 01:00:46 PM
In ca. 1981 friends of mine moved to Granby Colorado and I went to visit for a week of skiing at Winter Park.  When I got there, I recall that they had just got their telephone installed. They got a wall mounted phone, can't be sure of the model anymore, but it was on a party line, and I remember we looked at each other and joked about how backward this place still was.  I don't think it was a Bell company there.

I suspect that by 1960 still at least 50% of all telephones in the US were on party lines. I had the exact numbers at one time, but have to find it again to provide an accurate quote.
Title: Re: 54 500
Post by: unbeldi on April 19, 2016, 01:47:36 PM
BSP 502-510-401 Issue 8, October 1968 still describes the 501C and D sets, without marking them Manufacture Discontinued.  What it does appear to mark as MD is the 425 electron tube, replacing it with the 426 for all applications.  I think there seems to be some inductive noise improvements in the 426 over the 425, but I have to look at the data sheets in detail to believe what the BSP seems to suggest.
Title: Re: 54 500
Post by: poplar1 on April 19, 2016, 05:15:20 PM
Some ITT practices show 500s for 4-pty. Selective superimposed ringing using diodes rather than tubes.
Title: Re: 54 500
Post by: andre_janew on April 19, 2016, 06:45:38 PM
Could it be that 1959 was the last year for the 426 tube and that in 1960 they started using diodes?
Title: Re: 54 500
Post by: AL_as_needed on April 20, 2016, 02:38:02 PM
Well to partly answer the question of the tubes to chips conversation, I picked up a NOS 426A for the 501 and the box is dated 2-'73. Rather surprised, figured they would have ceased tube production by then in favor of a chipset. Doubt tubes were cheaper to make still by '73, although if western electric was making them in house that wouldn't be a big factor as they had the equipment well paid for by then.

Some eye candy....
Title: Re: 54 500
Post by: oldguy on April 20, 2016, 06:57:30 PM
I remember party lines, that was back when the Silicon Valley was all plum & apricot orchards. I picked up this WE 501 for $20 + shipping. It seemed to be in good shape & a nice dial card.
Title: Re: 54 500
Post by: RotarDad on April 21, 2016, 01:21:24 AM
At one point I was paying attention to dates on 501 models to see how late of a date I could find.  Here's one from July '61, tube still installed.  Oldguy, that is a nice one!  From what I've seen on Ebay, I'd say 90% of these are missing the tube.  Cool to find them all original....
Title: Re: 54 500
Post by: AL_as_needed on April 30, 2016, 01:57:39 PM
It finally showed up today, only worked on the 501, leaving the 2500 for another time. I have to say the packing job was excellent. Some pre-work pics. All '54, no tube, but that was expected.
Title: Re: 54 500
Post by: RotarDad on April 30, 2016, 04:04:48 PM
That should clean up nicely!  As you may already know, you will have to add some ringer gongs to make it ring - you've only got the aluminum resonators which mount under the brass bells.  Without bells, you'll get some clicking/tapping sounds and it won't be pretty..... ;)
Title: Re: 54 500
Post by: andre_janew on May 01, 2016, 05:00:05 PM
Nick in Manitou may have the bells you need!
Title: Re: 54 500
Post by: AL_as_needed on May 02, 2016, 08:27:29 AM
I have the gongs, took them off to evict a spider web before taking these pictures. It has been cleaning up well, may have to do some light wet sanding as the paint spots are on there real good. Also seems the case is warped. I have read of that before on here, any way to correct it? The base is straight but the case seems to lean to the right. Only noticeable around the dial.