Author Topic: Help me properly name these diagrams. (Read 1680 times)

Brinybay · « **on:** March 26, 2014, 04:16:42 PM »

For some reason I've got them named as "302-for-subset" diagrams, but I'm not sure that's correct. The obvious way is what the diagrams say, but I guess I'm wondering why I named them as "302-for-subset" in the first place.

Phonesrfun · « **Reply #1 on:** March 26, 2014, 08:07:20 PM »

They are both properly labeled at the top of the pages in bold print. They are both for 634 and 684 subsets. One diagram has the old 146A induction coil and the other has the newer 101A induction coil.

Both subsets are electrically equivalent to each other, and the 302 as a subset is also electrically equivalent to a 634 or 684 subset.

So I would label the one that has the tubular induction coil (146A) something like "634 - 684 subset with 146A induction coil", and the other one that has the transfromer like induction coil (the 101A) something like "634 - 684 subset with 101A induction coil"

tallguy58 · « **Reply #2 on:** March 26, 2014, 08:51:26 PM »

"634-684 with 101A or 302 base as a subset"

Leave the other one as is.

Brinybay · « **Reply #3 on:** March 27, 2014, 03:48:50 AM »

I didn't mean I wanted to change the label on the diagram itself, just the file name I gave them so I'll know which one is for wiring a 302 subset. Perhaps I erred, and neither diagram would be a useful reference for wiring a 302 as a subset?

Scotophor · « **Reply #4 on:** March 27, 2014, 05:30:49 AM »

The diagram with the 101A coil most closely resembles a 302 base, so use that one.

If your visit to the Classic Rotary Phones Forum was enjoyable or helpful, you may tell us by making a small donation. The donation can be made safely via PayPal and will help to off-set the costs of the Forum operation. Thank you!